View Poll Results: Which Design Is Better?
Mine
5
71.43%
Original
2
28.57%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll
My Touch-ups To The New Gtr Design
11-23-2007, 12:17 AM
#11
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 16
yeh my main worry with the intake was its affect on cd, but id be happy with just the headlight change tbh, ive always seen the GTR as an aggressive car, i think the new design of the front lets it down in that aspect, the front for me is just really too placid and not aggressive enough.
11-23-2007, 08:46 AM
#12
GTR Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
I wasn't trying to be rude in any way-I am just stating the extremely obvious.
Neither I nor ANYONE else here needs to drive the car to tell you it is too heavy. This is a fact. It will hurt the performance without question--someone please enlighten me how such weight can ever HELP the car. I thought it would come in about 3500, but the current weight puts its it in M5/Audi and sports sedan territory, and 200 pounds heavier than the already bigger new M3. This is a deal breaker for me. Again, either this is a mistake, or everyone ought to ignore the hype accept the fact it is grossly overweight.
Nissan I believe is saving the goodies for the special editions a year later.
The car looks fantastic, sounds fantastic, and will be good, but not nearly as great as it could be.
Neither I nor ANYONE else here needs to drive the car to tell you it is too heavy. This is a fact. It will hurt the performance without question--someone please enlighten me how such weight can ever HELP the car. I thought it would come in about 3500, but the current weight puts its it in M5/Audi and sports sedan territory, and 200 pounds heavier than the already bigger new M3. This is a deal breaker for me. Again, either this is a mistake, or everyone ought to ignore the hype accept the fact it is grossly overweight.
Nissan I believe is saving the goodies for the special editions a year later.
The car looks fantastic, sounds fantastic, and will be good, but not nearly as great as it could be.
11-23-2007, 07:41 PM
#14
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 16
I wasn't trying to be rude in any way-I am just stating the extremely obvious.
Neither I nor ANYONE else here needs to drive the car to tell you it is too heavy. This is a fact. It will hurt the performance without question--someone please enlighten me how such weight can ever HELP the car. I thought it would come in about 3500, but the current weight puts its it in M5/Audi and sports sedan territory, and 200 pounds heavier than the already bigger new M3. This is a deal breaker for me. Again, either this is a mistake, or everyone ought to ignore the hype accept the fact it is grossly overweight.
Nissan I believe is saving the goodies for the special editions a year later.
The car looks fantastic, sounds fantastic, and will be good, but not nearly as great as it could be.
Neither I nor ANYONE else here needs to drive the car to tell you it is too heavy. This is a fact. It will hurt the performance without question--someone please enlighten me how such weight can ever HELP the car. I thought it would come in about 3500, but the current weight puts its it in M5/Audi and sports sedan territory, and 200 pounds heavier than the already bigger new M3. This is a deal breaker for me. Again, either this is a mistake, or everyone ought to ignore the hype accept the fact it is grossly overweight.
Nissan I believe is saving the goodies for the special editions a year later.
The car looks fantastic, sounds fantastic, and will be good, but not nearly as great as it could be.
12-02-2007, 08:09 AM
#18
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 16
results from nissansilvia.com and skylinesaustralia.com
http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/i...pic=271180&hl=
http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/for...n-t194502.html
http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/i...pic=271180&hl=
http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/for...n-t194502.html
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)