|
R34 VS R35 pictures. Shes a big girl
Got these pics from i-club. Look at the size!
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/2019/r35amd5.jpg http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/4152/r35bil0.png http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/5884/r35cew5.jpg |
There is actually a bit of trick photography in this picture making the more distant objects larger instead of smaller, but using reference points, you can still see a clear size differential exists especially in width
|
Trick photography or not, it is noticeably larger. But for some reason it doesn't matter, in a good way :smilie_th
|
Wow, that is quite a bit bigger. The R34 wasn't all that small to begin with either.
|
Originally Posted by LeadfootInAnyCar
(Post 4756)
Wow, that is quite a bit bigger. The R34 wasn't all that small to begin with either.
Not at all, in fact the previous generations were quite large |
Originally Posted by CharlesJ
(Post 4761)
Not at all, in fact the previous generations were quite large
|
Nissan has proven that even the "big/over-weight/fat girl" can get around the track with the "Light-weight/high maintenance/anorexic super models":D
Most of the time her fat A$$ beats them.:confused: She is noticeably bigger than her predecessor... Nice Pics BTW.... Cheers, -Nate |
Originally Posted by LeadfootInAnyCar
(Post 4772)
Huh? That's what I meant. The R34s were not small cars. :confused:
Yeah...i meant not at all small. Sorry...my wording was a bit confusing |
You can really see the distortion in the straight on picture. Normal laws of vision will dictate that all lines converge as they go into the distance. In this shot, the lane markers actually go further apart as they go back making distant things larger. I cannot tell if tis is some kind of lens distortion or photochop though
|
Originally Posted by CharlesJ
(Post 4784)
Yeah...i meant not at all small. Sorry...my wording was a bit confusing
DONT HURT ME :help: |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:03 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands